๐Ÿ”AI RiskAtlas
โ† Risk Taxonomy
#34

Lack of reproducibility

Risk taxonomy

Definition

Models with the same parameters and identical inputs may generate different outputs, causing challenges to reproduce a specific output and determine accuracy across output variations.

Controls & guardrails that address this

4

Grouped by control function, with the AI lifecycle stage(s) to apply each and the other risks it addresses. Filter by control category below.

Control category
Preventive ยท 3
Model versioning and experiment tracking gate

Implement model versioning and experiment tracking as a governance requirement during build. Gate model promotion on version registry entry.

Lifecycle stage3 โ€“ Onboarding, Build & Review
Weight regularisation and normalisation

Document all regularisation parameters and normalisation configurations in the model card. Store version-controlled.

Lifecycle stage3 โ€“ Onboarding, Build & Review
Fine-tuning

Maintain version-controlled records of each fine-tuning run including dataset version, hyperparameters, and random seeds.

Lifecycle stage3 โ€“ Onboarding, Build & Review
Corrective ยท 1
Robustness testing

Periodically validate that deployed model versions remain reproducible. Test rollback procedures annually or after major updates.

Lifecycle stage5 โ€“ Usage, Monitoring & Change
Open these in the Control Library โ†’

Other risks in Robustness & Stability

AI RiskAtlas is an educational model of how GenAI & agentic systems work and fail. Architectures and payloads are illustrative and simplified for learning โ€” not operational guidance. Real-world cases are summarised from public reporting.

Sources & further reading โ†’ยทBuilt by Shi Yuan โ†—